The Influence of Policy Inducements and Embedded Relations on the Formation and Operations of Partnerships
Authors: Gordon Kingsley, Michael Waschak, Olga Sosinska

« Back to Poster Hall
4. Results
Next »

Table 2 provides a summary of the findings for the policy Delphi panelists. We are still building a similar table for the case studies but anticipate completion prior to the conference.


Table 7: Typology of Outcomes

 

Transformational Outcomes

Low High
Programmatic
Outcomes
Low

H
Cell 1: n=5
Outcomes: All programmatic
STEM Experience: 16 years
Teaching Experience: 6 years
Partnership Experience: 3 partnerships
Partnership Size: Small, 4 organizations
Goals: Curriculum and Teacher Dev.
Embeddedness: High
Policy: High, Federal, Negative

Cell 3: n=12
Outcomes: transformational-School District
STEM Experience: 12 years
Teaching Experience: 3 years
Partnership Experience: 2 partnerships
Partnership Size: Small, 18 organizations
Goals: Student Achievement, Teacher Dev., Partnership Dev.
Embeddedness: High
Policy: High, ½ Feds, ½ Fed and State

High

Cell 2: n=5
Outcomes: Programmatic-Teachers
STEM Experience: 12 years
Teaching Experience: 5 years
Partnership Experience: 2 partnerships
Partnership Size: Small, 6 organizations
Goals: Student Achievement, Teacher Dev.
Embeddedness: High
Policy: High, Federal, State, Negative

Cell 4: n=10
Outcomes: transformational-Partnership
Programmatic-Teachers and Students
STEM Experience: 13 years
Teaching Experience: 2.5 years
Partnership Experience: 7 partnerships
Partnership Size: Small, 15+ organizations
Goals: Student Achievement, Teacher Dev., and Partnership
Embeddedness: Low
Policy: High, Federal, State
TransformativeTransformative